Analysis of the Governance Models Applied in Agricultural Primary Cooperatives: The Case of Ilu Galan District, West Shawa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia

Authors

  • Mikire Dase Boka MA in Cooperative Management, Institute of Cooperatives and Development Studies, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
  • Motuma Hirpassa Minda Assistant Professor, TEFL & MA in Educational Planning and Management, Department of English Language and Literature, College of Social Science and Humanities, Ambo University, Ambo Ethiopia
  • S. Nakkiran Professor in Institute of Cooperatives and Development Studies, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v5i5.135

Abstract

Prompted by increased concern about cooperative governance, the study was conducted to analyze the governance architecture, the governance models applied and the factors determining the choice of the application of the models using data obtained from 114(99 male and 15 female) respondents from four  of Primary Agricultural cooperatives in Ilu Galan District. The study focuses on the governance architecture, six governance models (Democratic, Compliance, Partnership, Cooptation, Stakeholder and Rubber Stamp) and determining factors thematically organized in to seven themes: Teaming, leadership, Conflict of interest, Unnecessary intervention, legal, governance and education/training. The data analysis was made using descriptive statistics: percentage of frequency, weighted mean, standard deviation and ranking methods. The results identified that primary Agricultural cooperatives in the District have the poorly adapted governance architecture which cannot clearly show the governance framework or the four pillars (accountability, transparency, predictability and participation) and strategic leadership activities (the vision, mission, objectives and activities to be achieved in their plan and bylaw). The cooperatives hardly apply the principles of cooperatives in general and that of governance models in particular. Democratic, Co-optation, Rubber Stamp Models were the top three models that Primary Agricultural Cooperatives were implementing in the District. The data analyzed show that almost all the members of the cooperatives were confused with word “model†as a result of which governance related factors, lack of awareness/education/training, Teaming   and strategic leadership factors were the first four important factors in influencing the choice of the application of Cooperative Governance Model to Primary Agricultural Cooperatives in the District.  Therefore, the prescriptions for the cure also lie in bringing about improvement in these factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

ACDI/VOCA (2013). “Cooperatives Hold Economic Promise for Women in Ethiopia. Feed the Future Program Bolsters Cooperatives as Empowerment Strategy for Women.” Accessed February 4, 2013. www.acdivoca.org/site/ID/success-cooperatives-hold-economic-promise-women-Ethiopia

Areawai, and Haileslasie, T, (2013) “The Role of Cooperatives in Promoting Socio-Economic Empowerment of Women” Department of Cooperative Studies, College of Business and Economics, Mekelle University

Bezabih, E., (2008). Current Status of Cooperative in Ethiopia, Cooperative Africa, October 2008.

Bhagwaiti, P. (2003). “Some Dimensions of Cooperative Governance”, the Cooperator, 41(3),

Bhoria. K.S. (2002). “Cooperative Governance with particular reference to India”, The Co-operator, 40(6), NCUI: New Delhi.

Bruun, A. (2002). Contemporary co-operative governance, Canadian co-Operative association: Institute of Co-operative Studies 28-30, Kelowna, British Columbia. Canadian Non-Profits (Ottawa: Institute on Governance,)

Carver, J. (1997). Boardst hat Make a Difference: Anew Design for Leadership in non-profit and Public Organizations: San Francisco

Chambo.S (2009) Agricultural cooperatives: Role in food security and rural development Paper presented to cooperative group meeting on cooperative, New York.

Cornforth, Ch. (2002). “Making Sense of Co-operative Governance: Competing Models and

Corporate Boards that Create Value: Governing Company Performance from the Boardroom.

Duntaenman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

FAO (2011) The state of food and agriculture, 2010 – 2011. Rome, FAO.

Garber, N. (1997) Governance Models: What's Right for Your Board? : 1071 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 3K1 tel: (519) 670-4256 Skype: Nathan. Garber Nathan Garber & Associates email: nathan@GarberConsulting.com

Gill, M.. (2002)Governance Dos and DON’Ts: Lessons from Case Studies on Twenty

Houle, Cy. (1997).Governing Boards: Their Nature and Nurture (Prentice-Hall,)

Karthikeyan. M.(2008). Cooperative Governance – Training Manual, England Africa Partnership Project (British Council, UK), Ambo University College, Ambo, Ethiopia.

Manly, B.F.J. (2005), Multivariate Statistical Methods: A primer, Third edition, Chapman and Hall. NCUI:

Oliver, C.. (1999) The Policy Governance Field book: Practical Lessons, Tips and Tools from the Experience of Real- World Boards (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,) Tensions” in Review of International Co-operation, V.95#1 (Geneva: ICA,)

Oxfam International (2013). Women's Collective Action: Unlocking the Potential of Agricultural Markets. Oxfam International Research Report. Oxford, UK: Oxfam

Rencher, A.C. (2002), Methods of Multivariate Analysis, Second edition, Wiley.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-17

How to Cite

Boka, M. D., Minda, M. H., & Nakkiran, S. (2019). Analysis of the Governance Models Applied in Agricultural Primary Cooperatives: The Case of Ilu Galan District, West Shawa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal Online of Humanities, 5(5), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v5i5.135

Issue

Section

Articles