Exploring Prosodic Pragmatics at Affective Level

Authors

  • Rana Muhammad Basharat Saeed
  • Muhammad Umair Ashraf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v10i1.278

Abstract

This research work presents a conceptual framework to explore the interplay between intonation and emotional expressions that conveys pragmatic meaning of linguistic utterances. Theory of Affective Pragmatics (TAP), an innovative theory that functions parallel to speech act theory, is applied to introduce a conceptual framework to study prosodic pragmatics at a profound level. The affective component of attitude is introduced in the framework using Ostrom’s ABC model to comprehend affective pragmatics. For further study on this framework, quantitative research design is desirable to analyze data and the data is suggested to be obtained through emotional recordings from emotional prosody speech and transcripts (EPST). Praat as an apt tool recommended for the prosodic analysis of the data. This framework explains how intonation patterns signal unabridged emotions and feelings to understand speaker’s implied meaning. It elaborates the emotional expressions that convey pragmatic meaning to intellectualize affective pragmatics. It highlights some other facets that render affective pragmatics a new-fangled field of research. It has also been envisioned to broaden the scope of prosodic pragmatics as a distinctive research domain in linguistics. The framework is an application of TAP and provides grounds to researchers to understand prosodic pragmatics at a deeper level and to perform future researches in more effective ways. The research is unique in its essence as it offers a conceptual framework to explore affective component of attitude in prosodic pragmatics that has not yet been explored. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Rana Muhammad Basharat Saeed

The University of Lahore 

Sargodha Campus, Pakistan

Muhammad Umair Ashraf

BS (Hons) English 

ILM College  

Sargodha, Pakistan

References

Ali, S., & Hirst, D. (2007). Analysis by synthesis of English intonation patterns: generalising from form to function. Paper presented at the Internation Conference of Phonetic Sciences.

Betti, M. J. (2021). Intonation in English with Pedagogical Implications. In.

Chi, Y., Jeng, W., Acker, A., & Bowler, L. (2018). Affective, behavioral, and cognitive aspects of teen perspectives on personal data in social media: A model of youth data literacy. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information.

Cresti, E. (2018). The illocution-prosody relationship and the Information Pattern in spontaneous speech according to the Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). Linguistik online, 88(1).

Domaneschi, F., & Bambini, V. (2020). Pragmatic Competence.

Fischer, A., & Sauter, D. (2017). What the Theory of Affective Pragmatics Does and Doesn't Do. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 190-193. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2017.1338100

Goodhue, D., Wehbe, J., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2021). The effect of intonation on the illocutionary force of declaratives in child comprehension. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung.

Grice, M., & Baumann, S. (2007). An introduction to intonation-functions and models. TRENDS IN LINGUISTICS STUDIES AND MONOGRAPHS, 186, 25.

Jain, V. (2014). 3D Model of Attitude. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences.

Lai, L.-F., & Gooden, S. (2016). Acoustic cues to prosodic boundaries in Yami: A first look. Speech Prosody 2016, 624-628.

Madzlan, N. A., & binti Mahmud, C. T. (2018). Perception of the attitudinal function of intonation in responding to Yes/No questions: A study of non-native English language teachers. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 217-229.

Mozziconacci, S. (2002). Prosody and emotions.

Mozziconacci, S. J., & Hermes, D. J. (1997). A study of intonation patterns in speech expressing emotion or attitude: production and perception. IPO Annual Progress Report, 32, 154-160.

Mozziconacci, S. J., & Hermes, D. J. (1999). Role of intonation patterns in conveying emotion in speech. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences.

Paunovic, T. (2020). EFL Students’ Spontaneous Speech: Tonality, Tonicity, and Tone. Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies, 12, 51-76. doi:10.18485/bells.2020.12.3

Prieto, P., & Roseano, P. (2018). Prosody: Stress, rhythm, and intonation. In (pp. 211-236).

Pronina, M., Hübscher, I., Vilà-Giménez, I., & Prieto, P. (2021). Bridging the Gap Between Prosody and Pragmatics: The Acquisition of Pragmatic Prosody in the Preschool Years and Its Relation With Theory of Mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662124

Rodero, E. (2011). Intonation and emotion: influence of pitch levels and contour type on creating emotions. Journal of voice, 25(1), e25-e34.

Scarantino, A. (2017a). How to do things with emotional expressions: The theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry, 28(2-3), 165-185.

Scarantino, A. (2017b). Twelve questions for the theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry, 28(2-3), 217-232.

Taylor, P. (1998). The tilt intonation model.

Urbani, M. (2011). Instruments and methods for the analysis of prosody.

van Lieshout, P. (2003). PRAAT. University of Toronto, Graduate Department of SpeechLanguage Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Oral

Dynamics Lab, 4.2.1.

Ververidis, D., & Kotropoulos, C. (2012). A State of the Art Review on Emotional Speech Databases.

Wichmann, A., Dehé, N., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2009). Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics: Research at the Interface. In (pp. 1-20).

Wu, Y., Tessler, M. H., Asaba, M., Zhu, P., Gweon, H., & Frank, M. C. (2021). Integrating emotional expressions with utterances in pragmatic inference. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

Downloads

Published

17-02-2024

How to Cite

Basharat Saeed, R. M., & Umair Ashraf , M. (2024). Exploring Prosodic Pragmatics at Affective Level . International Journal Online of Humanities, 10(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v10i1.278