Effects of Linguistic Imperialism in Achieving Equity and Inclusion in English Language Teaching as a Second Language in Lesotho
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v11i4.328Keywords:
Linguistic Imperialism, Hegemony, Colonialism, Decolonisation, English as a Foreign LanguageAbstract
Even after efforts to decolonize education, post-colonial countries such as Lesotho are said to retain vestiges of colonial traditions in English language teaching. This has marginalized learners, cultures, and languages in the educational system. Following SDG 4.5, the study looked into the consequences of linguistic imperialism on English as a Foreign Language in Lesotho, which hinder equity and inclusion in the EFL environment. This study's philosophical lenses were derived from Critical Realism paradigm, which explored themes of power relations, politics, and language use. Furthermore, the study used a qualitative case study approach in six high schools to learn about the experiences of 6 EFL teachers. Data was collected through one-on-one open-ended interviews, then analysed thematically. The findings demonstrated that English's dominance in the language field maintains power dynamics that promote linguistic imperialism and impede complete epistemic access to language education. Strategies for eradicating hegemonic beliefs were examined, and the study recommended using the Grammar of the Decoloniality Framework to address the complexities of linguistic imperialism in an EFL classroom. The study found both harmful and beneficial consequences of linguistic imperialism. As a result, a paradigm shift away from a monolingual and monoculture approach and towards a more inclusive and multilingual perspective was recommended.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh University Press.
Branschat, F. (2019). Maximizing Colombia’s linguistic capital with the knowledge of linguistic imperialism and linguistic human rights (Master’s thesis, Universidad ICESI).
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Castaneda, H. (2018). Structuralist, poststructuralist, and decolonial identity in English language teaching and learning. ELT Local Research Agendas, 1, 17–34.
Charles, E. (2019). Decolonising the curriculum. Insights, 32(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.475
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Dharmawardena, W. (2018). The use of technology in education: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1102.01
Dooly, M., Moore, E., & Vallejo, C. (2017). Ethics in language education. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 351–362). Routledge.
Kachru, B. B. (2006). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.
Kubota, R. (2016). Race and learning in multicultural Canada: Towards critical antiracism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.892497
Lesotho Ministry of Education. (2009). Curriculum and assessment policy: Education for individual and social development. Government of Lesotho.
Masta, S. (2016). Disrupting colonial narratives in the curriculum. Multicultural Perspectives, 18(4), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.1222497
Núñez-Pardo, A. (2020). Inquiring into the coloniality of knowledge, power, and being in EFL textbooks. HOW, 27(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.2.566
Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Longman.
Pennycook, A. (2010). Translingual English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 30.1–30.18. https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0830
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2017). Linguistic imperialism. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbea10718.pub2
Pirbhai-Illich, F., Osberg, D., Martin, F., Chave, S., Sabbah, M., & Griffiths, H. (2017). Decolonising teacher education: Re-thinking the educational relationship seminar report. Canada-UK Foundation.
Shonamy, R. (2008). Language choices and language ideology in the language and identity practices of an Iranian immigrant woman in Canada. Language in Society, 37(3), 383–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080492
Shonamy, R. (2010). Negotiating identities in the language and identity practices of a young Iranian immigrant in Canada. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790711003660474
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Puseletso Christin Lebajoa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
-
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-
