Transforming Early- Stage Writing into Composing: How to Motivate Young ESL Learners to Write, the Activity Way

Authors

  • Dr. P. Bhaskaran Nair

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v10i4.288

Abstract

Writing is an activity in which mind and body are simultaneously engaged; content and language correlate; a person and ‘an other’, as a representative of a community, coexist. If any one element in the pairs mentioned above turns dysfunctional, writing collapses. While in a second or foreign language, possibilities of such failures and mismatches are more. This paper explores the potentials of the activity theory as discussed at length in the Soviet psychology of the first half of the last century. The paper begins with an inquiry into how writing instruction in English as a second language (ESL) can be made more productive, and ends with a proposal of transforming the act of writing into an activity of composing, using the framework of activity theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Dr. P. Bhaskaran Nair

Professor of English

Hindustan (Deemed to be) University

Padur, Chennai, India

References

Chaiklin, S. (2019). The meaning and origin of the activity concept in Soviet psychology—with primary focus on A. N. Leontiev’s approach. Theory and Psychology. 29. 1.pp. 3-26.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319828208

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press.

van Dijk, T.A. (1981). Episodes as Units of Discourse Analysis. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, pp. 177-195

Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual social transformation. In .Y. Engestrom., R. Mictinen., and R.I. Ponamaki.(eds.).Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp.19 – 38.

Gergen, C. A.(1992). Review of Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses .by Gee, J. P. Ilha do Desterro 29, 1992 pp 139-146.

Hadley, A. O. (1993). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle & Heinl

Krshen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London, Longman.

Lantolf, J.P., and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Matsuda, P. K. (2012).Let’s Face It: Language Issues and the Writing Program Administrator. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 141-163.

Myles, J. (2002). Second Language Writing and Research: The Writing Process and Error Analysis in Student Texts.Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. VI. 2.

Ortega, L. (2012). Epilogue: Exploring L2 Writing–SLA Interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21.4, pp. 404-415.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

West, M. P. (1937). The ‘Reading Approach’ and the ‘New Method System’. Modern Language Journal. 22.3. pp.220-222. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1937.tb00591.x

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford, Oxford

Downloads

Published

30-08-2024

How to Cite

Nair, D. P. B. (2024). Transforming Early- Stage Writing into Composing: How to Motivate Young ESL Learners to Write, the Activity Way. International Journal Online of Humanities, 10(4), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v10i4.288

Issue

Section

Articles