Revolutionary Ideals and Moral Dilemmas: Exploring Leftist Politics in Edward Bond’s The Bundle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v10i6.291Abstract
This study explores revolutionary ideals and moral dilemmas in Edward Bond’s The Bundle, focusing on its leftist politics. It analyzes how the play critiques capitalism and presents alternatives through themes of justice, compassion, and collective responsibility. Edward Bond is known for his politically charged plays. In The Bundle, he addresses issues of class struggle, inequality, and survival. The play critiques capitalist structures and explores the tension between individual morality and collective action. Bond uses his work to promote social and political transformation. The study uses a Marxist critical framework to explore the play’s ideological elements. Textual analysis examines the play’s narrative, characters, and symbolism. Historical and social contexts are also considered to situate the play in the tradition of leftist theater. The play critiques capitalism and advocates for collectivism. It presents the moral dilemmas faced by individuals in revolutionary movements. The abandoned child symbolizes the tension between survival and ethical action, reflecting the sacrifices needed for change. The study shows that The Bundle critiques socio-economic systems and calls for revolutionary action. It highlights the moral complexities of achieving justice in an unjust world. The Bundle challenges audiences to engage with the moral ambiguities inherent in revolutionary struggles. By critiquing capitalist oppression, it forces a confrontation with the ethical compromises that often arise in the pursuit of social change. Bond’s portrayal of these tensions emphasizes the complexities of balancing morality and progress. Ultimately, the play reinforces the enduring importance of politically conscious theatre as a tool for both critique and social transformation.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bond, Edward. Lear. Methuen Drama, 1972.
---. The Bundle. Methuen Drama, 1978.
Cousin, Geraldine. Edward Bond. Macmillan, 1978, p. 144.
Durbach, Errol. “Herod in the Welfare State: Kindermord in the Plays of Edward Bond.” Educational Theatre Journal, 27:4 (1975): 480-487.
Friedman, Arthur. “Review of Saved by Edward Bond.”Educational Theatre Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, 1970, pp. 97–98.
Hay, Malcolm and Philip, Roberts. Bond: A Study of his Plays. London: Eyre Methuen, 1980.
---.“Edward Bond and Revolutionary Theatre.” Modern Drama, vol. 26, no. 1, 1983, pp. 19-32. DOI:10.1353/mdr.1983.0003.
Innes, Christopher. Modern British Drama: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 293.
Itzin, Catherine. Stages in the Revolution: Political Theatre in Britain Since 1968. Eyre Methuen, 1980, p. 192.
Luckhurst, Mary. The Theatre of Edward Bond. Routledge, 2006, p. 79.
Prentice, Penelope. The Aesthetics of Failure: Edward Bond’s Political Theatre. Praeger, 2000, p. 114.
Spencer, Jenny. Dramatic Strategies in the Plays of Edward Bond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Taylor, John Russell. Anger and After: A Guide to the New British Drama. Methuen, 1962.
Wardle, Irving. “A Discussion with Edward Bond”. Gambit 5, No. 17 (1970), p, 16.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sameeul Haq Nazki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
-
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-