Logic and Truth: Gendered Words Perspectives in Sukuma Speech Community, Tanzania

Authors

  • Chipanda Simon
  • Tatu Nyange

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v11i3.311

Keywords:

Logic, Truth, Language; Sukuma; Gendered Words, Gender Norms

Abstract

The paper informs what exists pertinent to gender norms in the Sukuma speech community within the scope of philosophy of language and logic and truth in particular.  The paper was motivated by the exiting of social and gender norms in Sukuma through language and logic in Sukuma land and thus was selected purposively. The study used an interpretivism paradigm under a case study design in which the Njingani village of the Geita region of Tanzania was surveyed. The study used 21 informants in data collection via focus group discussion.  An embedded (mixed) research approach was applied in data analysis which was seconded by cognitive-developmental, grammar and Social theories. The study revealed that Sukuma lexemes i: e kaya, Nshimbe, mbehi, kulilwa and tola develop gender stigma on the expense of women in forms of gender disparity. Logically, it is a social pragmatics construction whose insights have no truth on gender stigma, thus needs new revelation for harmony.  It was recommended some communities including Sukuma need education on gender stereotypes and stigma; educators should avoid generalizations in their discussions of gender issues as people know their rights in their homestead. This would reduce gender stereotypes and biases which have been developed using different linguistics lexemes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Tatu Nyange

A Lecturer, Department of Languages and Literature

Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy

Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania

References

Akhter, et al. (2020). Gender Inequality and Literature: A Contemporary Issue. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 510: 593-596

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.

Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods, (4th ed). Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Fisher, A. (2021). You Talk Like a Girl: Stereotypes about Women’s Language. Un published MA thesis, Pace University.

Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press

Kombo D.K. & D.L.A. Tromp. (2006). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Nairobi: Paulines Publications Africa.

Langacker, R. (1982). Space Grammar, Analyzability and the English Passive. Language 58: 22-80.

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. (2000). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051

Lorber, J. (2018). The Social Construction of Gender, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331764683

Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa sebagai alat komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia. Kampret Journal, 1(2), 1–10.

Martin, L. C., Ruble, N. D., Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive Theories of Early Gender Development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903-933.

Montano, M.R.F et al. (2024). Language as an Agent of Change: Promoting Gender Fairness. Technium Social Sciences Journal Vol. 53, 336-354, January, 2024

Punch, K. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: Sage

Rokhmansyah, A. (2016). Pengantar gender dan feminisme: Pemahaman awal kritik sastra feminisme. Garudhawaca

Rokhmansyah, A. (2016). Pengantar gender dan feminisme: Pemahaman awal kritik sastra feminisme. Garudhawaca.

Salsabila, I.N et al. (2024). The Role of Gender in Language and Com-munication: A Linguistic Perspective. Journal Eduvest. 4 (1): 260-269

UNICEF. (2020). Advancing Positive Gender Norms and Socialization through UNICEF Programmes: Monitoring and Documenting Change.

Taylor, J. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press.

Taylor, J. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.

Tesch, R. (1994). The contribution of qualitative methods: Phenomenological research’, in MA Langenbach, C. Vaughn and L. Aagaard (eds), An introduction to Educational Research. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

West, A. (2015). A brief review of cognitive theories in gender development. Behavioural Sciences Undergraduate Journal, 2(1), 59-66.

Williams, M., & May, T (1996). Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Research. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

27-06-2025

How to Cite

Simon , C., & Nyange , T. (2025). Logic and Truth: Gendered Words Perspectives in Sukuma Speech Community, Tanzania. International Journal Online of Humanities, 11(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v11i3.311

Issue

Section

Articles