Logic and Truth: Gendered Words Perspectives in Sukuma Speech Community, Tanzania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v11i3.311Keywords:
Logic, Truth, Language; Sukuma; Gendered Words, Gender NormsAbstract
The paper informs what exists pertinent to gender norms in the Sukuma speech community within the scope of philosophy of language and logic and truth in particular. The paper was motivated by the exiting of social and gender norms in Sukuma through language and logic in Sukuma land and thus was selected purposively. The study used an interpretivism paradigm under a case study design in which the Njingani village of the Geita region of Tanzania was surveyed. The study used 21 informants in data collection via focus group discussion. An embedded (mixed) research approach was applied in data analysis which was seconded by cognitive-developmental, grammar and Social theories. The study revealed that Sukuma lexemes i: e kaya, Nshimbe, mbehi, kulilwa and tola develop gender stigma on the expense of women in forms of gender disparity. Logically, it is a social pragmatics construction whose insights have no truth on gender stigma, thus needs new revelation for harmony. It was recommended some communities including Sukuma need education on gender stereotypes and stigma; educators should avoid generalizations in their discussions of gender issues as people know their rights in their homestead. This would reduce gender stereotypes and biases which have been developed using different linguistics lexemes.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akhter, et al. (2020). Gender Inequality and Literature: A Contemporary Issue. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 510: 593-596
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods, (4th ed). Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Fisher, A. (2021). You Talk Like a Girl: Stereotypes about Women’s Language. Un published MA thesis, Pace University.
Kovecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press
Kombo D.K. & D.L.A. Tromp. (2006). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Nairobi: Paulines Publications Africa.
Langacker, R. (1982). Space Grammar, Analyzability and the English Passive. Language 58: 22-80.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. (2000). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051
Lorber, J. (2018). The Social Construction of Gender, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331764683
Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa sebagai alat komunikasi dalam kehidupan manusia. Kampret Journal, 1(2), 1–10.
Martin, L. C., Ruble, N. D., Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive Theories of Early Gender Development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903-933.
Montano, M.R.F et al. (2024). Language as an Agent of Change: Promoting Gender Fairness. Technium Social Sciences Journal Vol. 53, 336-354, January, 2024
Punch, K. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: Sage
Rokhmansyah, A. (2016). Pengantar gender dan feminisme: Pemahaman awal kritik sastra feminisme. Garudhawaca
Rokhmansyah, A. (2016). Pengantar gender dan feminisme: Pemahaman awal kritik sastra feminisme. Garudhawaca.
Salsabila, I.N et al. (2024). The Role of Gender in Language and Com-munication: A Linguistic Perspective. Journal Eduvest. 4 (1): 260-269
UNICEF. (2020). Advancing Positive Gender Norms and Socialization through UNICEF Programmes: Monitoring and Documenting Change.
Taylor, J. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
Tesch, R. (1994). The contribution of qualitative methods: Phenomenological research’, in MA Langenbach, C. Vaughn and L. Aagaard (eds), An introduction to Educational Research. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
West, A. (2015). A brief review of cognitive theories in gender development. Behavioural Sciences Undergraduate Journal, 2(1), 59-66.
Williams, M., & May, T (1996). Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Research. London: Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chipanda Simon , Tatu Nyange

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
-
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-