The Role of Morphology in Natural Language Processing: A Comparative Study of Agglutinative and Fusional Languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v10i5.359Keywords:
morphology, NLP, agglutinative languages, fusional languages, Turkish, Spanish, machine translationAbstract
This study investigates how morphological typology affects the performance of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. By comparing Turkish (agglutinative) and Spanish (fusional), we analyze tokenization, part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing, and machine translation accuracy. The findings reveal that morphological richness introduces challenges for NLP algorithms, particularly in agglutinative languages, and underscore the need for typology-aware model design. This research contributes to computational linguistics by highlighting the importance of morphological structure in language technology development.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.
Vasishth, S., & Lewis, R. L. (2006). Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and anti-locality effects. Language, 82(4), 767–794.
Lin, J., & Bever, T. G. (2006). Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(6), 559–596.
Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., & Gibson, E. (2015). Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), 10336–10341.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
-
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-