Scientific Feudalism: Reconstruction of the Medieval Hierarchy in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World

Authors

  • Muhammad Maaz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v12i2.362

Keywords:

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Medievalism, Scientific Feudalism, Dehumanization.

Abstract

Are we truly living in a scientifically advanced world where science and technology serve humanity, or have they become tools of control disguised as progress? This study explores Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World as a profound critique of such misuse, examining how the novel constructs a futuristic caste system that mirrors the fixed social orders of the medieval past while cloaking itself in the rhetoric of progress, efficiency, and stability. Through close reading, this paper identifies three major pillars of what may be called Huxley’s “scientific feudalism”: biological predestination, conditioned consent, and visual hierarchy. These mechanisms ensure that individuals not only perform their roles without resistance but also take pleasure in doing so, perceiving their positions in the social structure as both natural and desirable. Beneath the surface of modernity and technological advancement lies a meticulously engineered society where human freedom and individuality are sacrificed for the illusion of stability. By mapping the parallels between medieval feudalism and Huxley’s imagined future, this study argues that Brave New World transcends dystopian speculation to expose a deeper philosophical concern; the dehumanizing potential of science when subordinated to political and ideological control. Ultimately, Huxley warns that the technologies designed to liberate humanity may instead perfect its subjugation, revealing that the greatest danger to civilization lies not in scientific progress itself, but in its exploitation to sustain systems of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Muhammad Maaz

Ph.D. Scholar

Southwest University

Chongqing, P.R China

References

Anderson, Perry. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. Verso, 1974.

Bloch, Marc. Feudal Society. Translated by L. A. Manyon, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.

Brown, Elizabeth A. R. “The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe.” The American Historical Review, vol. 79, no. 4, 1974, pp. 1063–1088. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1869563.

Congdon, Brad. “ ‘Community, Identity, Stability’: The Scientific Society and the Future of Religion in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.” English Studies in Canada, vol. 37, nos. 3–4, 2011, pp. 83–105.

Foucault, Michel. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Edited by Mauro Bertani and Alessandro Fontana, translated by David Macey, Picador, 2003.

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. Harper & Row, 1946.

Moylan, Tom. Demand the impossible: Science fiction and the utopian imagination. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers, 2014.

Orwell, George. 1984. Harvill Secker, 1949.

Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. Penguin, 1985.

Reynolds, Susan. Fiefs and Vassals: The Medieval Evidence Reinterpreted. Oxford University Press, 1994.

Varoufakis, Yanis. Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. Melville House, 2024.

Downloads

Published

13-04-2026

How to Cite

Maaz, M. (2026). Scientific Feudalism: Reconstruction of the Medieval Hierarchy in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. International Journal Online of Humanities, 12(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v12i2.362

Issue

Section

Articles