Sexist Humor In TikTok: Content Strategies and The Normalization of Patriarchy in Digital Spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v11i3.314Keywords:
Sexist humor; TikTok; Patriarchy; Gender normalization; Critical discourse analysisAbstract
This article discusses the phenomenon of sexist humor in TikTok content and its contribution to the normalization of patriarchal values in the digital space. This research uses a qualitative approach with a critical discourse analysis (CDA) method to explore how sexist humor is represented, produced, and consumed on the short video-based social media platform. The research data comprised ten popular TikTok videos containing sexist humor, focusing on narrative structure, language, visual symbols, and audience responses.
The research findings show that sexist humor in TikTok often reproduces gender stereotypes through simple narratives full of patriarchal bias. Representations such as husbands fearing wives, emotional wives, or the traditional division of domestic roles are dominant themes. The humor is wrapped in light entertainment formats, such as text overlays, dramatic expressions, and upbeat music, making it difficult to recognize as a form of gender inequality. However, behind its comedic appearance, this humor reinforces patriarchal ideology by placing men at the center of the narrative, while women are reduced to emotional, manipulative, or subordinate objects. In the discourse practice dimension, the production strategy of sexist humor content is designed to be viral and relevant to the audience's daily experience. TikTok's algorithm that supports high engagement also amplifies the distribution of this content, creating a cycle in which gender stereotypes are continuously reproduced and normalized. As primary consumers, young audiences tend to internalize these messages as social truths, impacting the shaping of gender perceptions and behaviors beyond digital platforms.
Theoretically, this research draws on the framework of patriarchy, gender performativity, and the concept of symbolic violence to explain how sexist humor works as a subtle ideological tool that maintains patriarchal hegemony. The article emphasizes the importance of gender-based critical media literacy in developing public awareness about the negative impact of sexist humor. This research contributes to academic and practical discussions on the relationship between digital culture, humor, and gender dynamics and the need for social interventions to create more inclusive and equitable digital spaces.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ashraf, F., & Jepsen, D. (2024). Private Patriarchy’s Impact on Women’s Careers: Through Kaleidoscope Career Model Lens. Group and Organization Management, 0(0), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241227263
Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11316rx
Barta, S., Belanche, D., Fernandez, A., & Flavian, M. (2023). Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103149
Billig, M. (2012). Laughter and Ridicule : Towards a Social Critique of Humour. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211779
Bouckaert, Y., Vofrei, L., Jonczyk, N., Mertens, A., Soliman, M., Venz, L., & Loschelder, D. D. (2024). Is the joke on you? The impact of sexist humour and gender dynamics on interpersonal work outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2429850
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Basil Blackwell. https://monoskop.org/images/4/43/Bourdieu_Pierre_Language_and_Symbolic_Power_1991.pdf
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 21–34.
https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge. https://lauragonzalez.com/TC/BUTLER_gender_trouble.pdf
Cela, H., Veit, S. V, & Wood, G. (2024). Breaking down the laughter: an exploration into the linguistic dimensions in stand-up comedy ratings. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02187-6
Chavez, J. V, & del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.18063/FLS.V5I1.1530
Chavez, J. V, Lamorinas, D. D., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Message patterns of online gender-based humor, discriminatory practices, biases, stereotyping, and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i2.1535
Cohen-Chen, S., Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K., & Hameiri, B. (2024). Humorous Responses to Gender Injustice: The Contrasting Effects of Efficacy and Emotions on Women’s Collective Action Intentions. Sex Roles, 90(2), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01459-0
Douglas, E. R. (2015). Foucault, laughter, and gendered normalization. Foucault Studies, 20, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.4934
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis the critical study of language, second edition. In Critical Discourse Analysis:The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022
Gupta, M., Madabushi, J. S., & Gupta, N. (2023). Critical Overview of Patriarchy, Its Interferences With Psychological Development, and Risks for Mental Health. Cureus, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40216
Humonen, K., & Whittle, A. (2025). ‘Just relax and ram it in’: Dimensions of power in workplace sexual humour. Organization, 32(3), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231201277
Johnston, M., & Meger, S. (2024). Morbid symptoms: a feminist dialectics of global patriarchy in crisis. European Journal of International Relations, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661241295658
Little, H. (2023). Stereotypes, gender, and humor in representations of coders in Silicon Valley. Review of TV series Silicon Valley (HBO 2014–2019). Science as Culture, 32(2), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2189094
Motel, L., & Peck, B. (2018). SexIER symbols: Examining the effects of a content analysis of gendered visual imagery in cross cultural road signs. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v18i2.761
Motel, L., & Peck, B. (2018). SexIER symbols: Examining the effects of a content analysis of gendered visual imagery in cross cultural road signs. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v18i2.761
Nash, C. J. (2009). Patriarchy. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 102–107). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00982-2
Parrott, S., & Hopp, T. (2020). Reasons people enjoy sexist humor and accept it as inoffensive. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 28(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1616737
Reizer, A., & Brender-Ilan, Y. (2024). Start With a Joke: Humor, Presenter’s Status, Gender, and Investment Level. SAGE Open, 14(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241299562
Ringblom, L. (2022). “It is Just a Joke!” Informal Interaction and Gendered Processes Underground. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 30(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2021.2009028
Riquelme, A. R., Carretero-Dios, H., Megias, J. L., & Romero-Sanchez, M. (2021). Individual differences in the appreciation and interpretation of subversive humor against sexism versus sexist humor: The role of feminist identity and hostile sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110794
Tanner, S., & Gillardin, F. (2025). Toxic Communication on TikTok: Sigma Masculinities and Gendered Disinformation. Social Media and Society, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251313844
Vijaya, R., & Meghana, J. (2020). Humour and Gender Stereotypes. IASSI Quarterly: Contributions to Indian Social Science, 39(1), 58–75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343787004
Vizcaino-Cuenca, R., Riquelme, A. R., Romero-Sanchez, M., Megias, J. L., & Carretero-Dios, H. (2024). Exposure to Feminist Humor and the Proclivity to Collective Action for Gender Equality: The Role of Message Format and Feminist Identification. Sex Roles, 90(1), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01430-5
Walby, S. (1990). Theorising Patriarchy. Basil Blackwell. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/21680/1/1990_Walby_Theorising_Patriarchy_book_Blackwell.pdf
Yin, Q., & Binti Abdullah, K. (2024). Analysis of Gender Discourse Bias and Gender Discrimination in Social Media: A Case Study of the TikTok Platform. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 24(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i2.802
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Naniana N. Benu, Ni Made Ayu Sulasmini, Ni Luh Supartini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
-
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-
