Shadows of the Empire: Postcolonial Identity and Language in Contemporary Anglophone Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v1i5.65Keywords:
Postcolonialism, Anglophone Literature, Identity, Hybridity, Decolonization, Language Politics, HegemonyAbstract
This article examines the complex intersection of language, colonial legacy, and identity formation within contemporary Anglophone literature. Operating from a postcolonial framework, the study investigates how authors from formerly colonized nations appropriate and subvert the English language—historically an instrument of imperial domination—to articulate fractured, hybrid, and resistant identities. By engaging with the critical paradigms of linguistic decolonization and cultural hybridity, this paper argues that modern Anglophone literature does not merely adopt the colonizer’s tongue but fundamentally restructures it. Through an analysis of abrogative and appropriative linguistic strategies, the research demonstrates how the linguistic "margins" continuously dismantle and reshape the imperial "center," effectively transforming English into a pluralistic medium for postcolonial self-determination.
Downloads
References
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Daniel Jack

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
-
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
-